Vinas et al v. MLJ Painting Corp. et al
| Brayan Diego, Andreas Vinas and Jhon Vinas |
| Joseph Picataggi and MLJ Painting Corp. |
| 1:2019cv02921 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Robert M Levy |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION for pre motion conference by MLJ Painting Corp., Joseph Picataggi. (Solomon, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 Letter by Jhon Vinas (Aronauer, Jacob) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against MLJ Painting Corp., Joseph Picataggi, filed by Jhon Vinas, Andreas Vinas. (Aronauer, Jacob) |
ORDER finding as moot #8 Motion for Pre-Motion Conference; granting #10 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement. The plaintiffs must serve their amended complaint by July 5, 2019. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 6/28/2019. (Lupo, Brandi)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION to Amend/Correct/Supplement by Jhon Vinas. (Aronauer, Jacob) |
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Jhon Vinas. (Aronauer, Jacob) |
|
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The plaintiff is to respond to the defendant's pre-motion conference letter by June 26, 2019. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 6/19/2019. (Lupo, Brandi)
|
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by MLJ Painting Corp., Joseph Picataggi. (Solomon, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jhon Vinas. Joseph Picataggi served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. (Aronauer, Jacob) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jhon Vinas. MLJ Painting Corp. served on 5/24/2019, answer due 6/14/2019. (Aronauer, Jacob) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against MLJ Painting Corp., Joseph Picataggi, filed by Jhon Vinas, Andreas Vinas. (Aronauer, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Jhon Vinas (Aronauer, Jacob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MLJ Painting Corp., Joseph Picataggi filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11488195 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Jhon Vinas, Brayan Diego. (Aronauer, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
