Liu et al v. McAleenan et al
| Saiying Liu and Zhouxin Liu |
| Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, Director Donald Neufeld and Acting Director Kenneth Cuccinelli |
| 1:2019cv04812 |
| August 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT in favor of Donald Neufeld, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan against Saiying Liu, Zhouxin Liu. That this action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. (Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 9/30/19) c/m (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, This action shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. (Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto, on 9/23/2019) c/m Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal with prejudice for the Court's endorsement by Kenneth Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan, Donald Neufeld (Priore, Shana) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saiying Liu, Zhouxin Liu. Donald Neufeld served on 8/22/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. (Lee, Corey) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saiying Liu, Zhouxin Liu. Kenneth Cuccinelli served on 8/22/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. (Lee, Corey) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Saiying Liu, Zhouxin Liu. Kevin McAleenan served on 8/22/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. (Lee, Corey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Shana C. Priore on behalf of Kevin McAleenan, Donald Neufeld (aty to be noticed) (Priore, Shana) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kenneth Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan, Donald Neufeld, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kenneth Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan, Donald Neufeld filing fee $ 400, receipt number BNYEDC-11782266 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Saiying Liu, Zhouxin Liu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Lee, Corey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
