Shaw v. The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman et al
| Alex Shaw, III |
| Howard Pollack and The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman |
| 1:2019cv04835 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Letter to Hon. Kiyo A. Matsumoto regarding Plaintiff's Mailing Address served on Alex Shaw III, pro se on 10/8/19, filed by The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman. (Spithogianni, James) |
| Filing 9 Letter re Plaintiff's Mailing Address by The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman (Spithogianni, James) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit of Service to October 4, 2019 letter motion requesting pre-motion conference served on Alex Shaw III, pro se on 10/4/19, filed by The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman. (Spithogianni, James) |
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman. (Spithogianni, James) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for *corrected* Affidavit of Service of 9-10-19 letter requesting extension of time to answer complaint and 9-30-19 court order granting same served on Alex Shaw III, pro se on 10/1/19, filed by The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman. (Spithogianni, James) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for 9-10-19 letter requesting extension of time to answer complaint and 9-30-19 court order granting same served on Alex Shaw III, pro se on 09/30/19, filed by The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman. (Spithogianni, James) |
ORDER granting #4 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. The Court grants Defendant The Estate of Michell L. Kaufman's motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint nunc pro tunc. The Estate shall file its response by October 4, 2019. Counsel for the Estate is directed to immediately serve a copy of this Order on pro se Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/30/2019. (Ammari, Kamil)
|
| Filing 4 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman. (Spithogianni, James) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Howard Pollack, The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number 4653142903 (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howard Pollack, The Estate of Mitchell L. Kaufman, filed by Alex Shaw, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
