Ball v. Stevenson
| Raymond Ball |
| Angelene Stevenson |
| 1:2019cv05310 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Roslynn R Mauskopf |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew B. Keller on behalf of Angelene Stevenson (aty to be noticed) (Keller, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Raymond Ball. The Attorney General of the State of New York or the District Attorney ofQueens County, as attorney for Respondent, shall show cause before this Court,by the filing of a return to the petition, why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued. Within sixty (60) days of receipt of this Order to Show Cause, Respondent shall serve a copy of the return on Petitioner herein and file the original thereof with the Court, together with proof of service. Respondent shall electronically file the State Court Record. Petitioner, within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of a copy of the return, shall file his or her reply, if any, with the Court. So Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/18/2019. (c/m Electronic service of OTSC with #1 Petition served upon Queens County DA and NYS Attorney General on 9/20/2019) (Almonte, Giselle)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond Ball. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Raymond Ball. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ball v. Stevenson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Angelene Stevenson | |
| Represented By: | QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | Matthew B. Keller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Raymond Ball | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
