BHMPW Funding LLC v. GEK Realty and Home Improvement LLC
| GEK Realty and Home Improvement LLC |
| BHMPW Funding LLC |
| 1:2019cv05904 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Letter to the Honorable Eric N. Vitaliano requesting extension of time on consent to file the parties' briefs, by BHMPW Funding LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Extending Briefing Schedule) (Zinman, Daniel) |
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Upon review of appellant's letter, the Court grants, on consent, the motion to extend the briefing schedule. Appellant shall file its opening brief no later than December 31, 2019. Appellee shall file its brief no later than January 30, 2020. Appellant shall file its reply brief no later than February 13, 2020. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 12/12/2019. (LoMonaco, Anthony)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Bankruptcy Record Received. Notice to all parties, in accordance with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010(b)(3), that the record has been received or is available electronically. Parties shall now follow briefing schedule as set forth in Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8018. Specifically, appellant must serve and file a brief within 30 days of this notice, the appellee must serve and file a brief within 30 days after service of the appellants brief, and the appellant may serve and file a reply brief within 14 days after service of the appellees brief, but a reply brief must be filed at least 7 days before scheduled argument. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Claim 3-1, #2 Trans of Add Rece on Appeal (BK, #3 Trans of Add Rec on Appeal (BK: Notice Recipients) (Lee, Tiffeny) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 1-17-40228., filed by BHMPW Funding LLC. (Attachments: #1 #167 BK Documents, #2 #167-1 Transmittal, #3 #167-2 Notice Recipients) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Notice that appeal from the Bankruptcy Court has been docketed. Parties shall file with the Bankruptcy Clerk their designations of items to be included in the record and statement of issues to be presented pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BHMPW Funding LLC v. GEK Realty and Home Improvement LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: GEK Realty and Home Improvement LLC | |
| Represented By: | Douglas J. Pick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: BHMPW Funding LLC | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Neil Zinman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
