Polanco Brothers Corp. v. Car2Go N.A., LLC
Plaintiff: Polanco Brothers Corp. and Polanco Brothers Corp. doing business as Steam Green Clean
Defendant: Car2Go N.A. LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv05988
Filed: October 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Kiyo A Matsumoto
Referring Judge: Ramon E Reyes
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 1/22/2020 at 11:45 AM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr., located in the United States Eastern District of New York Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201. All counsel are required to attend, and plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all counsel are aware of their obligation to appear. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Prior to the conference, the parties are to comply with the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. (See attached blank document) Case Management Statement must be completed and filed on ECF no later than 1/17/2020. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 12/4/2019. (Vertus, Miriam)
December 3, 2019 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Car2Go N.A. LLC. (Polchinski, Peter)
December 3, 2019 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Car2Go N.A. LLC identifying Corporate Parent car2go Holding, Inc., Other Affiliate car2go Dutschland GmbH for Car2Go N.A. LLC. (Polchinski, Peter)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 Motion for Defendant Car2Go N.A. LLC Extension of Time to Answer the Complaint by 12/3/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 11/27/2019. (Vertus, Miriam)
November 26, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, #4 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons Issued by Car2Go N.A. LLC. (Polchinski, Peter)
November 11, 2019 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Defendant Car2Go N.A., LLC on November 4, 2019, filed by Polanco Brothers Corp.. (Brash, Benjamin)
November 1, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Car2Go N.A. LLC. (Galeano, Sonia)
November 1, 2019 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Polanco Brothers Corp. (Brash, Benjamin)
October 29, 2019 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Polanco Brothers Corp. (Brash, Benjamin)
October 29, 2019 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 29, 2019 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 29, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
October 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11977140 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Polanco Brothers Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to the Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Brash, Benjamin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Polanco Brothers Corp. v. Car2Go N.A., LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Polanco Brothers Corp.
Represented By: Benjamin Israel Brash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Polanco Brothers Corp. doing business as Steam Green Clean
Represented By: Benjamin Israel Brash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Car2Go N.A. LLC
Represented By: Peter D. Polchinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?