Musarra v. Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C.
Plaintiff: Jennifer Musarra
Defendant: Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C.
Case Number: 1:2019cv06373
Filed: November 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: William F Kuntz
Referring Judge: Peggy Kuo
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION for pre motion conference re #1 Complaint, Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)6 and 12(c) by Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C.. (Powietrzynski, Aleksander)
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for defendant Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C. to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to January 10, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 12/17/2019. (Riquelme, Claudia)
December 16, 2019 Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or otherwise move until January 10, 2020 by Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C.. (Powietrzynski, Aleksander)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held in this case on January 15, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge, in Courtroom 11C South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. All counsel are required to attend. Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. At least five days before the Conference, the parties must file a completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/pub/PK-discovplan.pdf. Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that defendant is aware of the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 12/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Discovery Plan) (Riquelme, Claudia)
November 26, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Musarra. Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C. served on 11/21/2019, answer due 12/12/2019. (Barshay, David)
November 13, 2019 Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
November 13, 2019 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. Additionally, case is reassigned to Office Code 1: Brooklyn as per civil cover sheet Rule 50.1(d)(2). (Rodin, Deanna)
November 12, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C.. (Bowens, Priscilla)
November 12, 2019 Case assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
November 12, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of Jennifer Musarra (aty to be noticed) (Barshay, David)
November 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12051629 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Jennifer Musarra. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sanders, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Musarra v. Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roach & Murtha Attorneys at Law, P.C.
Represented By: Aleksander Piotr Powietrzynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Musarra
Represented By: David M. Barshay
Represented By: Craig B. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?