Houston v. Capra
| Tyrone Houston |
| Michael Capra |
| 1:2019cv07246 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| William F Kuntz |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter Not Contesting the Timeliness of the Petition by Michael Capra (Twersky, Sholom) |
| Filing 6 Letter dated 1/10/2020 to the Pro se Clerk from Tyrone Houston regarding his new address. Pro se Plaintiff also informs the Court that he made an error on the copies of his Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court grants #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ORDERED that Respondent shall file a limited answer to the petition, addressing the timeliness of this petition #1 under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d), within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. ORDERED that no reply is required, however, should Petitioner choose to reply, the replyshall be served on Respondent's counsel and filed with the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days of receipt of the answer. C/mailed to Petitioner. Electronic service re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tyrone Houston. SO Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 1/14/2020. (Tavarez, Jennifer)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyrone Houston. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Tyrone Houston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Houston v. Capra | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Capra | |
| Represented By: | KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tyrone Houston | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
