Design Pics Inc. v. PBH Networks, Inc. et al
Design Pics Inc. |
Does 1-10, PBH Networks, Inc. and PBH Networks, Inc. doing business as All That's Interesting |
1:2020cv01096 |
February 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Margo K Brodie |
James Orenstein |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT It appearing from the docket maintained in this action that defendant PBH Networks, Inc. has failed to appear or otherwise defend this action, the default of defendant PBH Networks, Inc. is hereby noted pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Poveda, J.) |
Filing 9 Request for Certificate of Default by Design Pics Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Michael D. Steger in Support of Request for Certificate of Default, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order Proposed Certificate of Default) (Steger, Michael) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Design Pics Inc.. PBH Networks, Inc. served on 3/6/2020, answer due 3/27/2020. (Steger, Michael) |
Filing 7 Notice of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (Rocco, Christine) (Main Document 7 replaced on 2/28/2020) (Rocco, Christine). |
Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PBH Networks, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by Design Pics Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Design Pics Inc. Notice of Copyright Action (Form AO121) (Steger, Michael) Modified on 2/28/2020 (Bowens, Priscilla). (Main Document 2 replaced on 2/28/2020) (Bowens, Priscilla). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1-10, PBH Networks, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12462526 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Design Pics Inc.. (Steger, Michael) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/28/2020: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Bowens, Priscilla). (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/28/2020) (Bowens, Priscilla). |
Case assigned to Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.