Mills v. Travers et al
| Selwyn Mills |
| Dr. John Doe 2, G. Travers, HSA, Dr. John Doe 1 and Mrs. Timothy, R.N. |
| 1:2020cv03035 |
| July 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Account Statement as to Selwyn Mills (Ramesar, Thameera) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's #2 application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915 is granted. Plaintiff brings this #1 civil rights action alleging that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical condition. Pursuant to Valentin v. Dinkins, 121 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 1997) (per curiam), the Court hereby directs the United States Attorney General's Office (the "Office") to identify the defendants allegedly involved in this case and to provide addresses for service of process by August 31, 2020. After the Office identifies and provides addresses for service of process for defendants, the Court shall direct the United States Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff's #4 "motion for service of process by U.S. Marshal's Service," is denied. The parties shall advise the Court by signing the enclosed form whether they jointly consent to trial and decision on this case by me, a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on July 21, 2020. C/mailed w/Attachments: #1 Consent to Trial and Decision by a United States Magistrate Judge. (The United States Attorney General's Office's Response due by 8/31/2020.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Pay Civil Filing Fee - Prisoner Case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (as amended July 26, 1996), plaintiff/petitioner is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from plaintiffs/petitioners prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). Original letter sent to the Warden/Superintendent of Correctional Facility. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Produce Service of Process by U.S. Marshals Service by Selwyn Mills. (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 7/8/2020 (Bowens, Priscilla). |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Authorization (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Selwyn Mills. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Selwyn Mills. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
