Rubin v. HSBC Bank USA, NA et al
Plaintiff: David Rubin
Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and HSBC Bank USA, NA
Case Number: 1:2020cv04566
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Referring Judge: Rachel P Kovner
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2020 Filing 22 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by HSBC Bank USA, NA. (Frontino, Brian)
November 23, 2020 Filing 21 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HSBC Bank USA, NA identifying Corporate Parent HSBC Holdings plc., Other Affiliate HSBC USA, Inc., Other Affiliate HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. for HSBC Bank USA, NA. (Frontino, Brian)
November 23, 2020 Filing 20 Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative and Other Defenses by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Stieber, Courtney)
November 23, 2020 Filing 19 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services LLC. (Stieber, Courtney)
November 23, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Carol Ann DiPrinzio on behalf of HSBC Bank USA, NA (aty to be noticed) (DiPrinzio, Carol)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: The Motion to Extend Time to File an Answer #15 is granted. Defendant HSBC Bank USA, NA ("HSBC") has established that the factors set out in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), namely "(1) whether the default was willful; (2) whether setting aside the default would prejudice the adversary; and (3) whether a meritorious defense is presented," weigh in favor of granting the motion. First, HSBC has established that the default was not willful, but rather the result of protracted negotiations with Plaintiff to extend the time to answer. See Kaisha v. Train Wreck Ltd. Liab. Co., No. 17-CV-3625, 2018 WL 4103582, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. May 29, 2018) ("[T]he court may find a default to have been willful where the conduct of counsel or the litigant was egregious and was not satisfactorily explained." (quotation omitted)). Indeed, HSBC first contacted Plaintiff regarding a proposed extension a week before the answer was due. Second, Plaintiff consented to the extension of time to file. And third, HSBC is prepared to promptly file an answer and proceed with litigation, which indicates that a meritorious defense may be present; the Court's preference is to resolve cases on the merits, not on default. HSBC is directed to file its answer by 11/23/2020. The Motion #14 is denied as moot in light of the subsequent motion. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 11/6/2020. (Farrell, Gillian)
November 2, 2020 Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #15 Notice of MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, /Notice of Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by HSBC Bank USA, NA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 10/23/2020 Email) (Frontino, Brian)
November 2, 2020 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 Notice of MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, /Notice of Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by HSBC Bank USA, NA. (Frontino, Brian)
November 2, 2020 Filing 15 Notice of MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, /Notice of Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by HSBC Bank USA, NA. (Frontino, Brian)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: On October 26, 2020, Defendant HSBC Bank USA, NA moved to extend the time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint #14 . The answer was due on October 23, 2020. Because it is seeking to extend the time to answer after the time to do so has passed, it must file a motion by 11/2/2020 that explains why, under the standards set forth in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), a belated answer is permissible, and why a default should not be entered. Liang v. Home Reno Concepts, LLC, 803 F. App'x 444, 446 n.2 (2d Cir. 2020). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/28/2020. (Farrell, Gillian)
October 26, 2020 Filing 14 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, /Letter Motion for a 45-day extension of time up to and including December 7, 2020 to move, answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by HSBC Bank USA, NA. (Frontino, Brian)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #13 is granted. Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC shall file an answer to the Complaint by 11/23/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/22/2020. (Farrell, Gillian)
October 21, 2020 Filing 13 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Stipulated Extension Request by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Stieber, Courtney)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial/telephone conference will be held on 1/08/2021 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the 12:00 PM conference. Plaintiff are directed to notify defendants of this scheduling order at the time defendants makes an appearance with in the matter. Counsel are also directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 1/08/2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/20/2020. (Manson, Eddie)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #11 is granted. Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. shall answer the Complaint by 11/20/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/16/2020. (Farrell, Gillian)
October 15, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Burman, Ashley)
October 15, 2020 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate VantageScore Solutions LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Burman, Ashley)
October 15, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashley Diane Burman on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Burman, Ashley)
October 12, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Rubin. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 10/2/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. (Singer, Adam)
October 5, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Rubin. HSBC Bank USA, NA served on 10/2/2020, answer due 10/23/2020. (Singer, Adam)
October 2, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Rubin. Equifax Information Services LLC served on 10/1/2020, answer due 10/22/2020. (Singer, Adam)
September 29, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett David Sherman on behalf of David Rubin (aty to be noticed) (Sherman, Brett)
September 25, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., HSBC Bank USA, NA. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (Davis, Kimberly)
September 25, 2020 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 25, 2020 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 25, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., HSBC Bank USA, NA filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13422019 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by David Rubin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons: HSBC, #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons: Equifax, #4 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons: Experian) (Singer, Adam)
September 25, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rubin v. HSBC Bank USA, NA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC
Represented By: Courtney Sophie Stieber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Ashley Diane Burman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, NA
Represented By: Carol Ann DiPrinzio
Represented By: Brian C. Frontino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Rubin
Represented By: Adam Guttmann Singer
Represented By: Brett David Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?