American United Transportation Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency et al
| American United Transportation Inc. |
| Sarah Dunlea, United States Drug Enforcement Agency and United States of America |
| 1:2020cv06231 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. Signed Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 1/19/2021. (Almonte, Giselle) |
Filing 6
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, This action shall be dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 1/14/2021. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal for the Court's Endorsement by United States of America (Dharia, Ekta) |
| Filing 4 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7 which requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration "all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28U.S.C. sec. 1343, wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of$150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs." Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7(d)(3).After an Answer is filed, the arbitration hearing will be scheduled. (Credle, Rita) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United States of America from Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, case number 034327-19. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Filing of Removal) (Dharia, Ekta) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
