Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
| Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc. |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00855 |
| February 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Robert M Levy |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and to Adjourn Initial Conference Scheduled for April 20, 2021 (on Consent) by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Rappoport, Steven) |
ORDER RE #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Application granted, on consent. United Parcel Service, Inc. answer due: 4/26/202; initial telephone conference adjourned to May 13, 2021 at 2:30 p.m.. Parties are directed to call 888-684-8852 and use access code # 6223489. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 4/5/2021. (Marino, Janine)
|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION Verification of First Amended Complaint by Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc. (Bronstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT Wireless Xtreme NYC, Inc., against United Parcel Service, Inc., filed by Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Bronstein, Joshua) |
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Extend Time until 3/25/21 to File Amended Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 3/12/2021. (Marino, Janine)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Adjourn Conference extend time to file amended Complaint by Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc.. (Bronstein, Joshua) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference by telephone has been scheduled for April 20, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge at (888) 684-8852; Access Code #: 6223489. All counsel must be available. Plaintiffs counsel is directed to confirm with defendant's counsel that all necessary participants are aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 3/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 IC Questionnaire, #2 Individual Rules) (Marino, Janine)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Levitt, Jamie) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United Parcel Service, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Rappoport, Steven) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Parcel Service, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County, case number 500631/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14160047) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rappoport, Steven) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Steven Thomas Rappoport |
| Represented By: | Jamie A. Levitt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wireless Xtreme NYC Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Reid Bronstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
