Pierce v. Ryder et al
| Brigid Pierce |
| NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER SAID, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER DANIELLE MOSES, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER JOSEPH RYDER, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-8, NYC Police Officer Joseph Ryder, NYC Police Officer Danielle Moses, NYC Police Officer Said and NYC Police Officers John Does #1-8 |
| 1:2021cv03482 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| James R Cho |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, from August 30 to September 13 by The City of New York. (Ryan, Erin) |
ORDER: The #21 application to have this case deemed related to Lopez v. Gamble, et al., No. 21-CV-2492 (EK) (VMS), is denied. This case is not sufficiently similar factually to justify relation. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/10/2021. (Nguyen, Andrew)
|
| Filing 22 REPLY in Opposition re #21 Letter filed by The City of New York. (Ryan, Erin) |
| Filing 21 Letter to the Clerk of the Court re Related-Case Application by Brigid Pierce (Katovich, Scout) |
|
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #20 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants The City of New York, NYC Police Officer Said, NYC Police Officer Danielle Moses and NYC Police Officer Joseph Ryder. shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by August 30, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 7/16/2021. (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by The City of New York. (Ryan, Erin) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin T. Ryan on behalf of The City of New York (aty to be noticed) (Ryan, Erin) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brigid Pierce. Danielle Moses served on 6/23/2021, answer due 7/14/2021. (Katovich, Scout) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brigid Pierce. Said served on 6/25/2021, answer due 7/16/2021. (Katovich, Scout) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brigid Pierce. Joseph Ryder served on 6/23/2021, answer due 7/14/2021. (Katovich, Scout) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brigid Pierce. The City of New York served on 6/24/2021, answer due 7/15/2021. (Katovich, Scout) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Danielle Moses, Joseph Ryder, Said, The City of New York. (Attachments: #1 D. Moses, #2 Said, #3 City of NY) (Layne, Monique) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 12 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 11 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 9 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 8 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The proposed summons filed open on read only and cannot be modified so they cannot be endorsed by The Clerk. Please refile a correct summons/format. If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Scout Katovich on behalf of Brigid Pierce (aty to be noticed) (Katovich, Scout) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Brigid Pierce (Maazel, Ilann) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER DANIELLE MOSES, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER JOSEPH RYDER, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER SAID, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-8, THE CITY OF NEW YORK filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14584503 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Brigid Pierce. (Maazel, Ilann) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
