Muradova v. Cioppa et al
Shohista Muradova |
District Director Thomas Cioppa, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Director of F.B.I. Christopher Wray |
1:2021cv05583 |
October 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Civil Case Terminated per #8 . (Layne, Monique) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shohista Muradova (Usher, Mikhail) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David Allen Cooper on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Cooper, David) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shohista Muradova. Thomas Cioppa served on 10/11/2021, answer due 11/1/2021; Merrick B. Garland served on 10/11/2021, answer due 11/1/2021; Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 10/11/2021, answer due 11/1/2021; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 10/11/2021, answer due 11/1/2021; Christopher Wray served on 10/11/2021, answer due 11/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service CoS on Alejandro Mayorkas, #2 Certificate of Service CoS on AUSA, #3 Certificate of Service CoS on Christopher A. Wray, #4 Certificate of Service CoS on Merrick Garland, #5 Certificate of Service CoS on Thomas Cioppa) (Usher, Mikhail) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Garland summons, #2 Jaddou summons, #3 Wray summons, #4 Mayorkas summons) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Shohista Muradova (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Ur Mendoza Jaddou, #2 Proposed Summons Merrick Garland, #3 Proposed Summons Alejandro Mayorkas, #4 Proposed Summons Christopher A. Wray) (Usher, Mikhail) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Petition for Writ of Mandamus) against Thomas Cioppa, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Christopher Wray filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14913238 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Shohista Muradova. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I360 Receipts, #2 Exhibit Composite Inquiries, #3 Exhibit I131 and I765 Receipts, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Usher, Mikhail) |
Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.