Rodriguez v. Avec Drinks Co.
| Angel Rodriguez |
| Avec Drinks Co. |
| 1:2021cv06993 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER of dismissal with prejudice. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 3/21/2022. (Greene, Donna)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Avec Drinks Co. (Rao, Nandini) |
|
STATUS REPORT ORDER: At #10 , Defendant states that this matter has settled. On or before 3/18/2022, the Parties will file their stipulation of dismissal. The 3/23/2022 telephonic initial conference is adjourned sine die. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 3/4/2022. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
| Filing 10 Letter to Magistrate Judge Scanlon, dated March 3, 2022, re: parties have reached a settlement in principle. by Avec Drinks Co. (Rao, Nandini) |
|
ORDER granting consent #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline to answer the Complaint or otherwise move is extended to 3/12/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 2/7/2022. (Quinlan, Krista)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Avec Drinks Co.. (Rao, Nandini) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: A Telephonic Initial Conference is scheduled for 3/23/2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The parties are to call 877-336-1829 and type in the access code 3581283 for the AT&T conference bridge. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. The parties must complete the attached Joint Proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) and file it on ECF no later than 3/8/2022. In addition to appearing parties' submission of the CMP as directed herein, in the event that any Defendant(s) has not answered or otherwise appeared, Plaintiff(s) must also mail a copy of this Order, its attachment and the full docket to the last known mailing address(es) for such Defendant(s) and file proof on ECF by the CMP filing date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 1/11/2022. (Lozar, Ryan)
|
|
ORDER granting #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer due 2/10/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 1/7/2022. (Scully, Nicole)
|
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Avec Drinks Co.. (Rao, Nandini) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nandini Rao on behalf of Avec Drinks Co. (aty to be noticed) (Rao, Nandini) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Judith A Archer on behalf of Avec Drinks Co. (aty to be noticed) (Archer, Judith) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Avec Drinks Co.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Avec Drinks Co. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15129736 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Angel Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Shaked, Dan) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Avec Drinks Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angel Rodriguez | |
| Represented By: | Dan Shaked |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Avec Drinks Co. | |
| Represented By: | Judith A Archer |
| Represented By: | Nandini Rao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
