Vurgun v. Maimonides Medical Center et al
| Serin Vurgun |
| Maimonides Medical Center and Kenneth Gibbs |
| 1:2022cv00995 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 6/27/2022 @ 2:15 PM before Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak. Initial conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 2:15 PM. Enter Access code: 380-1746 and security code: 22-0995. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 4/18/2022. (Caggiano, Diana)
|
| ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #10 : Defendants' time to answer, move, or otherwise respond in this action is held in abeyance. Parties are to provide a status report as to mediation by 5/30/2022. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak on 4/14/2022. (Nordstrom, Britta) |
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Kenneth Gibbs, Maimonides Medical Center. (Nevolis, Steven) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Ronald Nevolis on behalf of Kenneth Gibbs, Maimonides Medical Center (aty to be noticed) (Nevolis, Steven) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Serin Vurgun. Kenneth Gibbs waiver sent on 2/24/2022, answer due 4/25/2022; Maimonides Medical Center waiver sent on 2/24/2022, answer due 4/25/2022. (Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kenneth Gibbs, Maimonides Medical Center. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Serin Vurgun (Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Serin Vurgun (Attachments: #1 Rider) (Lee, C.K.) (Main Document 3 replaced on 2/24/2022) (Bowens, Priscilla). |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Serin Vurgun (Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kenneth Gibbs, Maimonides Medical Center filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15317776 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Serin Vurgun. (Lee, C.K.) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
