Angeles v. Buy Buy Baby, Inc.
Fanny Angeles |
Buy Buy Baby, Inc. |
1:2022cv01002 |
February 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Nicholas G Garaufis |
Peggy Kuo |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(i), Plaintiff Fanny Kimberly Angeles hereby dismisses all claims against Defendant without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 4/15/2022. (Fernandez, Erica) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fanny Angeles Without Prejudice (Kopel, Yitzchak) |
ORDER: In light of the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed at #9 , the initial conference scheduled for May 27, 2022 is canceled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 3/25/2022. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fanny Angeles. Buy Buy Baby, Inc. served on 3/7/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (Kopel, Yitzchak) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held by telephone in this case on May 27, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge. All counsel are required to attend. The parties are directed to call toll free (877) 336-1274 and input the Access Code 1453850 at the time of the Conference. No additional security code is needed. Once all parties are on the line, the call will be connected. (The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.8, they may not independently record any court proceedings. A transcript of the proceedings may be ordered from the Clerk's Office.) Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By May 20, 2022, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that Defendant is aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 2/25/2022. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Buy Buy Baby, Inc. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Fanny Angeles (Kopel, Yitzchak) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The CLERK OF COURT name needs to be updated/corrected Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Fanny Angeles (Kopel, Yitzchak) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/25/2022: #1 Additional Corrections) (Landow, Concetta). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Buy Buy Baby, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15319656 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Fanny Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Kopel, Yitzchak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Angeles v. Buy Buy Baby, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Fanny Angeles | |
Represented By: | Yitzchak Kopel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Buy Buy Baby, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.