Yang v. Joshua D. Zuckerman, MD, FACS, P.C.
Stephen Yang |
Joshua D. Zuckerman, MD, FACS, P.C. d/b/a Zuckerman Plastic Surgery and Joshua D. Zuckerman, MD, FACS, P.C. doing business as Zuckerman Plastic Surgery |
1:2022cv01604 |
March 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Frederic Block |
Robert M Levy |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement by Stephen Yang (Ngo, Rayminh) |
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's answer is due 5/21/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 4/15/2022. (Ramirez, Alexia) |
Filing 11 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Stephen Yang. (Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Stephen Yang. (Ngo, Rayminh) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The defendant's letter application #10 for an extension of time to serve and file an answer is DENIED without prejudice to re-file their application addressed to MJ Levy who will be handling all pre-trial matters in this litigation. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 4/14/2022. (Innelli, Michael) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stephen Yang. Joshua D. Zuckerman, MD, FACS, P.C. served on 3/31/2022, answer due 4/21/2022. (Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 8 Notice of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (Rocco, Christine) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Joshua D. Zuckerman, MD, FACS, P.C.. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Stephen Yang (Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Stephen Yang of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright (Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Stephen Yang (Ngo, Rayminh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joshua D. Zuckerman, MD, FACS, P.C. d/b/a Zuckerman Plastic Surgery filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15403011 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Stephen Yang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ngo, Rayminh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.