Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC v. MiMedia, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC
Defendant: MiMedia, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01803
Filed: March 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: James R Cho
Referring Judge: Kiyo A Matsumoto
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #12 Second Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant MiMedia, Inc. shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by 6/24/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/26/2022. (Gillespie-Cardo, Saudia)
May 25, 2022 Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer via letter request by MiMedia, Inc.. (Solomita, Michael)
May 5, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-15537639. by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice) (Johnson, Jay)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Jay B. Johnson shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the 150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/5/2022. (Gillespie-Cardo, Saudia)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant MiMedia, Inc. shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by 5/25/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 4/26/2022. (Gillespie-Cardo, Saudia)
April 25, 2022 Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer via letter request by MiMedia, Inc.. (Solomita, Michael)
April 4, 2022 Filing 9 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 complaint, #2 patent registration) (Rocco, Christine)
April 1, 2022 Filing 8 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 1, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to MiMedia, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla)
April 1, 2022 Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC (Johnson, Jay)
April 1, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 31, 2022 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/1/2022: #1 Additional Corrections) (Jakubowski, Laura).
March 31, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (Johnson, Jay)
March 31, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC identifying Other Affiliate Patent Asset Management, LLC for Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (Johnson, Jay)
March 31, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC (Johnson, Jay)
March 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MiMedia, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15428555 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Johnson, Jay) Modified on 4/1/2022 (Jakubowski, Laura).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC v. MiMedia, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC
Represented By: Jay B. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MiMedia, Inc.
Represented By: Michael V. Solomita
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?