Liu v. Mayorkas et al
| Fengmei Liu |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou, Director of Texas Se Tony Bryson and US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland |
| 1:2022cv02339 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Tony Bryson, Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Dharia, Ekta) |
Civil Case Terminated as per parties' Rule 41(a) stipulation. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 5/16/2022. (Cogan, Brian)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ekta R. Dharia on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Dharia, Ekta) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fengmei Liu. All Defendants. (Hu, Lewis) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for a telephonic Initial Status Conference on 6/7/2022 at 4:45 pm. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 2339#. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to notify all attorneys in this action of the conference schedule in writing. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government must file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Counsel is directed to review Judge Cogan's Individual Practices, which may be obtained on the Court's website at https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/content/judge-brian-m-cogan. Requests for adjournment of the conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Judge Cogan's Rules. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/26/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15503925, filed by Fengmei Liu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit) (Hu, Lewis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
