Barnett Forest, LLC v. Bollinger Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff: Barnett Forest, LLC
Defendant: Bollinger Construction, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv02426
Filed: April 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: William F Kuntz
Referring Judge: Roanne L Mann
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Bollinger Construction, Inc. (Lee, Tiffeny)
May 13, 2022 Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Barnett Forest, LLC (Fusco, Richard)
May 13, 2022 Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: Did not use the correct Summons form AO 440 Rev 6/12 .Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Lee, Tiffeny)
May 12, 2022 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Barnett Forest, LLC (Fusco, Richard)
May 12, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. Fusco on behalf of Barnett Forest, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Fusco, Richard)
April 28, 2022 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
April 28, 2022 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
April 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15516080 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Barnett Forest, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Arrowbrook OA, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Shady Grove OA, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Barnett T&C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Altabet, Edward)
April 28, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnett Forest, LLC v. Bollinger Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barnett Forest, LLC
Represented By: Edward Daniel Altabet
Represented By: Richard J. Fusco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bollinger Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?