Masad et al v. United States of America et al
| Ahmed Masad and Utica Deli & Grill 1 Inc. |
| United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture |
| 1:2022cv03613 |
| June 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held in this case on October 28, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. before Peggy Kuo, United States Magistrate Judge in Courtroom 11C South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. All counsel are required to attend. Counsel are directed to the annexed Initial Conference Order for instructions. By October 24, 2022, the parties must file a joint and completed copy of the Proposed Discovery Plan, a PDF version of which may be found at: # https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/PK-discovplan.pdf Any request for adjournment of this or any other conference must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether or not all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least two (2) business days before the scheduled conference, except in the event of an emergency. Counsel with knowledge and authority must be present. Per diem counsel may not appear without prior permission of the Court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that Defendants are aware of this conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 6/21/2022. (O'Neil-Berven, Ryan)
|
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint,, by Ahmed Masad, Utica Deli & Grill 1 Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Berkowitz, Jess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Judicial Review against United States Department of Agriculture, United States of America filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15674279 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Ahmed Masad, Utica Deli & Grill 1 Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit FNS letter 4/23/2020, #3 Exhibit Transaction Reports, #4 Exhibit Attorney letter 5/1/2020, #5 Exhibit FNS letter 12/3/2021, #6 Exhibit Attorney letter 12/9/2021, #7 Exhibit Final Agency Decision) (Berkowitz, Jess) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
