Smith v. US Bank National Association Mastr Asset Securities Trust 2006-WMC2 et al
Plaintiff: Stephen Smith
Defendant: US Bank National Association Mastr Asset Securities Trust 2006-WMC2 and WMC Mortgage Group
Case Number: 1:2022cv04207
Filed: July 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: Pamela K Chen
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2022 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT, that Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3); that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal, Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). (Signed by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 7/25/2022) (Galeano, Sonia)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Plaintiff's #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. However, for the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum & Order, this case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/22/2022. (Kim, Eliot)
July 19, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 14, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Stephen Smith. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Stephen Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. US Bank National Association Mastr Asset Securities Trust 2006-WMC2 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Bank National Association Mastr Asset Securities Trust 2006-WMC2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WMC Mortgage Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?