Nikiema v. Menges
Petitioner: Thomas Nikiema
Respondent: Patricia A. Menges
Case Number: 1:2022cv04639
Filed: August 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Patricia A. Menges (Dharia, Ekta)
August 31, 2022 Civil Case Terminated. In light of the #7 stipulation of dismissal, this case is terminated and closed. (Stephan, Keegan)
August 14, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ekta R. Dharia on behalf of Patricia A. Menges (aty to be noticed) (Dharia, Ekta)
August 11, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas Nikiema. Patricia A. Menges served on 8/11/2022, answer due 10/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipts, #2 Exhibit USPS Online Proof of Delivery on U.S. Attorney Office EDNY) (Yerman, Gary)
August 8, 2022 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 8, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 8, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Patricia A. Menges, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 8/8/2022 (Bowens, Priscilla).
August 8, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Naturalization Hearing In The Nature Of Mandamus filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15821345, filed by Thomas Nikiema. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit) (Yerman, Gary)
August 8, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nikiema v. Menges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas Nikiema
Represented By: Gary J. Yerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Patricia A. Menges
Represented By: Ekta R. Dharia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?