Clarke v. The Jamaica Hospital
| Camille Clarke |
| The Jamaica Hospital d/b/a Jamaica Hospital Medical Center |
| 1:2023cv02109 |
| March 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Marcia M Henry |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #6 : Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 05/26/2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 04/12/2023. (MY)
|
| Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by The Jamaica Hospital. (Hoey, Barbara) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Camille Clarke. The Jamaica Hospital served on 3/23/2023, answer due 4/13/2023. (Hassan, Abdul) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Jamaica Hospital filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16511299 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Camille Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Hassan, Abdul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clarke v. The Jamaica Hospital | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Camille Clarke | |
| Represented By: | Abdul Karim Hassan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Jamaica Hospital d/b/a Jamaica Hospital Medical Center | |
| Represented By: | Barbara E. Hoey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
