Weisberg v. MedTech Products, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA WEISBERG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Cynthia Weisberg
Defendant: MEDTECH PRODUCTS, INC. and PRESTIGE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE COMPANY, MedTech Products, Inc. and Prestige Consumer Healthcare Company
Case Number: 1:2024cv02946
Filed: April 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2024 Civil Case Terminated as per Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. (PW)
June 7, 2024 Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Cynthia Weisberg (Costello, Andrew)
June 4, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony Anscombe on behalf of MedTech Products, Inc., Prestige Consumer Healthcare Company (notification declined or already on case) (Anscombe, Anthony)
June 3, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #7 Anthony Anscombe's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for defendants. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance to ensure electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the $200 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 6/3/2024. (PW)
May 20, 2024 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by MedTech Products, Inc., Prestige Consumer Healthcare Company. (Glassman, Evan)
May 17, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 200, receipt number ANYEDC-17886690 by MedTech Products, Inc., Prestige Consumer Healthcare Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Anthony Anscombe, #2 Proposed Order) (Anscombe, Anthony)
April 30, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #6 . First, defendant may have until 5/20/2024 to file its answer because "[i]n truth, the answer in a civil action is the most useless paper in the courthouse." Alexander By and Through Alexander v. Richardson-Merrell Inc., 541 F.Supp. 93, 94 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Far more useful is the joint statement of the case that the parties are required to submit pursuant to this Court's Scheduling Order in advance of the initial status conference. In addition, although the Court will grant a short adjournment of the Initial Status Conference, this case is going to move a lot faster than either side apparently thinks. The conference is adjourned to 6/17/2024 at 11:00 am. The parties are directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 949146687#. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/30/2024. (PW)
April 29, 2024 Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by MedTech Products, Inc., Prestige Consumer Healthcare Company. (Glassman, Evan)
April 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 5/23/2024 at 11:00 am. The parties are directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 949146687#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/29/2024. (PW)
April 29, 2024 Opinion or Order ORDER STRIKING #4 . This stipulation is void and of no effect as extensions of time can only be granted by the Court, not plaintiff's counsel. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). If defendants' counsel wanted to be governed by state practice, he shouldn't have removed the case. In addition, the Court is not convinced that defendant has demonstrated a reasonable probability that the amount in controversy satisfies CAFA's jurisdictional minimum, although it will allow defendant to make further submissions on that point. See, e.g., Starke v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 2011 WL 13294965, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2011). Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 4/29/2024. (PW)
April 25, 2024 Filing 4 STIPULATION to Adjourn Time to Respond to Complaint, by MedTech Products, Inc., Prestige Consumer Healthcare Company (Glassman, Evan)
April 22, 2024 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM)
April 22, 2024 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (SDM)
April 19, 2024 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by MEDTECH PRODUCTS, INC. and PRESTIGE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE COMPANY (Glassman, Evan)
April 19, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MEDTECH PRODUCTS, INC. and PRESTIGE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE COMPANY from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, case number 507103/2024. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-17793307) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents) (Glassman, Evan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weisberg v. MedTech Products, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA WEISBERG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Weisberg
Represented By: Andrew G. Costello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEDTECH PRODUCTS, INC. and PRESTIGE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE COMPANY
Represented By: Evan Glassman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MedTech Products, Inc.
Represented By: Anthony Anscombe
Represented By: Evan Glassman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prestige Consumer Healthcare Company
Represented By: Anthony Anscombe
Represented By: Evan Glassman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?