Williams v. Exactech Inc et al
| Maurice Williams |
| Exactech U.S., Inc., Exactech Inc, Osteon Holding Inc., Osteon Intermediate Holdings II Inc., Osteon Merger Sub Inc and TPG Inc |
| 1:2024cv04276 |
| June 17, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Marcia M Henry |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER GRANTING #3 MOTION TO APPEAR Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Troy A. Brenes is granted permission to appear pro hac vice on behalf Plaintiff Maurice Williams. The attorney shall register for ECF at #www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the 200 admission fee be submitted to the Clerk's Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 06/21/2024. (SY)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Exactech Inc, Exactech U.S., Inc., Osteon Holding Inc., Osteon Intermediate Holdings II Inc., Osteon Merger Sub Inc, TPG Inc. (TLH) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Maurice Williams (Brenes, Troy) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (AF) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Motions referred to Marcia M. Henry. (AF) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The full case caption must appear on the summons. Please list all defendants in the case caption on the summons., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (AF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 200, receipt number ANYEDC-17984559 by Maurice Williams. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Affidavit, #3 Certificates of Good Standing, #4 Proposed Order) (Brenes, Troy) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Maurice Williams (Brenes, Troy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Exactech Inc, Exactech U.S., Inc., Osteon Holding Inc., Osteon Intermediate Holdings II Inc., Osteon Merger Sub Inc, TPG Inc filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-17984492 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Maurice Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Brenes, Troy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
