Nguyen v. Garland et al
| Duc C Nguyen |
| Ur M. Jaddou, Andrea J. Quarantillo, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Connie Nolan |
| 1:2024cv06473 |
| September 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Natasha C Merle |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Connie Nolan, Andrea J. Quarantillo, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Duc C Nguyen (Mundy, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Duc C Nguyen (Mundy, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Duc C Nguyen filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18282077 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Duc C Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A, #2 Exhibit Ex B, #3 Exhibit Ex C) (Mundy, Nicholas) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Natasha C. Merle. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
