Neuman v. Blue Jay Transit Inc. et al
| Joshua Neuman |
| City of New York, Veoride, Inc. doing business as Veo, Neutron Holdings, Inc. doing business as Lime, Blue Jay Transit Inc. doing business as Bird and Blue Jay Transit USFM LLC doing business as Bird |
| 1:2024cv07430 |
| October 24, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Pre Motion Conference. The pre-motion conference is set for February 25, 2025 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 4G North. The Court sua sponte extends the Blue Jay defendant's and Veoride's due date for answering or otherwise responding to the complaint to February 3, 2025. If the Blue Jay defendants, Veoride, or the City seek to file a dispositive motion, they may file a letter, not to exceed 3 pages, requesting to participate in the pre-motion conference, by February 3, 2025. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 12/4/2024. (MK)
|
| Filing 16 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #14 Amended Complaint Or Otherwise Respond to Amended Complaint by City of New York. (Koplik, Pamela) |
|
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The City defendant will file an answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint by February 3, 2025. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 12/3/2024. (MK)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION for pre motion conference filed by Joshua Neuman. (Neuman, Jonathan) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Blue Jay Transit Inc., Blue Jay Transit USFM LLC, City of New York, Neutron Holdings, Inc., Veoride, Inc., filed by Joshua Neuman. (Neuman, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by City of New York. (Koplik, Pamela) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela Ann Koplik on behalf of City of New York (aty to be noticed) (Koplik, Pamela) |
|
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The City defendant will file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by February 3, 2025. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 11/26/2024. (MK)
|
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the defendant Neutron Holdings's #11 pre-motion conference letter. The plaintiff must file a response, not to exceed 3 pages, by December 3, 2024. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 11/22/2024. (MK)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for pre motion conference by Neutron Holdings, Inc.. (Jacobson, Jeffrey) |
|
ORDER: Defendants Blue Jay Transit Inc. and Blue Jay Transit USFM LLC (the "Blue Jay defendants") request, with plaintiff's consent, an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint. ECF No. #9 . The request is granted. The Blue Jay defendants shall respond to the complaint by December 8, 2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 11/18/2024. (JS)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Ariadne Anna Panagopoulou Alexandrou on behalf of Blue Jay Transit Inc., Blue Jay Transit USFM LLC (aty to be noticed) (Panagopoulou Alexandrou, Ariadne) |
| Filing 9 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the Complaint by Blue Jay Transit Inc., Blue Jay Transit USFM LLC. (Shapiro, Peter) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter T. Shapiro on behalf of Blue Jay Transit Inc., Blue Jay Transit USFM LLC (aty to be noticed) (Shapiro, Peter) |
|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The defendant VeoRide's due date for answering or otherwise responding to the complaint is December 1, 2024. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 11/8/2024. (MK)
|
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer until December 1, 2024, with consent by Veoride, Inc.. (Howell, Kelly) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Neutron Holdings, Inc. for Extension Request (Jacobson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Neutron Holdings, Inc. OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Jacobson, Jeffrey) |
|
ORDER: Defendant Neutron Holdings, Inc. removed this purported class action from Queens County Supreme Court on October 24, 2024, invoking this Court's diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332(d). ECF No. #1 . The record does not reflect whether plaintiff has served the other defendants in this action. Plaintiff shall serve the other defendants by January 22, 2025 and file proof of service on the docket. See Kogan v. Facebook, Inc., 334 F.R.D. 393, 399 n.3 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) ("Rule 4(m)'s 90 -day period for service begins to run on the date of removal." (citation omitted)).Separately, defendant Neutron Holdings, Inc. requests, with plaintiff's consent, an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint. ECF No. #4 . Although it was not made in compliance with my Individual Rules, the request is granted as first requests for an extension are generally granted as a courtesy. Defendant Neutron Holdings, Inc. shall respond to the complaint by November 21, 2024. Neutron shall serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff's counsel forthwith and file proof of service on the docket. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 10/31/2024. (JS)
|
| Filing 4 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Neutron Holdings, Inc.. (Jacobson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (KD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Neutron Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Lime from SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS, case number 720173/2024. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-18424632) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jacobson, Jeffrey) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ann M. Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
