Pall Corporation v. Cuno Incorporated
| Pall Corporation |
| Cuno Incorporated |
| Cuno Incorporated |
| Pall Corporation |
| 2:2003cv00092 |
| January 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
322
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION IN PART: For the reasons set forth in the attached order, the Court denies 3M's motion for reconsideration in part 425 with respect to the h-max formula. The Court will hear oral argument on the HDC-II filter iss ue on Thursday, 9/17/2015 at 2:00 pm in Courtroom 4F North. The attached opinion also makes a correction to this Court's 3/31/2015 Order 420 Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/20/2015. Associated Cases: 9:97-cv-07599-PKC-SIL, 2:03-cv-00092-PKC-SIL (Chiang, May)
|
|
Filing
282
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 269 Motion for Attorney Fees: Defendant is awarded $34,350.00 in attorney's fees and $7,697.45 in costs, for a total award of $42,047.45. Plaintiff shall make payment within twenty (20) days. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 6/1/2012. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
|
Filing
237
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: For the reasons contained in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, defendant's motion for sanctions is denied. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 3/25/2011. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
|
Filing
193
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: Cuno's motion to compel is granted. Pall is directed to produce the withheld documents that pertain to the reexamination proceedings before the PTO within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Depositions of Pall 9;s counsel shall proceed, as directed by the Order dated April 8, 2010. Failure to comply with this Order will result in Pall being precluded from offering evidence of its good faith in defense to Cuno's inequtiable conduct conterclaim at the trial in this action. Discovery is extended an additional thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 6/8/2010. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
|
Filing
169
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: For the reasons contained in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, defendant's motion to amend its Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims is granted in its entirety. Defendant is directed to file its Amended Answer within five (5) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is directed to file its Reply to defendant's Counterclaims within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. The parties are requested to provide a revised discovery schedule on or before February 15, 2010. SEE Memorandum Opinion & Order for further details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle on 1/20/2010. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
