Thorsen v. County of Nassau et al
Case Number: 2:2003cv01022
Filed: February 28, 2003
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Thomas C. Platt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 150 ORDER re 137 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 3/17/2011. c/ecf (Miller, Dina)
August 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER re 140 , 142 : See attached order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 8/30/2010. c/ecf (Miller, Dina)
June 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 116 : See attached. The defendants' motions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59(a) are granted in part and denied in part. There will be a new trial on damages unless Thorsen agrees to the reduction to the sum of $500,000 for his emotional distress damages. The defendants' remaining motions are denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 6/30/2010. (c/ecf) (Warshaw, Aaron)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thorsen v. County of Nassau et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?