Tankleff v. The County of Suffolk et al
| Martin Tankleff |
| The County of Suffolk, K. James McCready, Norman Rein, Charles Kosciuk, Robert Doyle, John McElhone, John Doe Police Officers #1-10, Richard Roe and Suffolk County Employees #1-10 |
| 2:2009cv01207 |
| March 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Suffolk |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| William D. Wall |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
191
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 180 Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 180) is DENIED, and the case will proceed to trial. Because no claims remain against Lieutenant McElhone, the Clerk of the Cou rt is directed to TERMINATE Lieutenant McElhone as a defendant in this action. See supra note 2. As to Plaintiff's request for a pre-trial conference (Docket Entry 190), the parties are directed to file a joint proposed pre-trial order on or before September 8, 2017. The parties are further directed to appear for a pre-trial conference with Judge Shields on September 11, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/23/2017. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 172 Motion to Substitute Party; granting 176 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement; For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion to substitute Theresa and Brett McCready as Defendants in this action in their cap acity as the legal successors of Defendant K. James McCready (Docket Entry 172) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion to amend (Docket Entry 176) is similarly GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption in this action so that De fendant K. James McCready is replaced with "Theresa and Brett McCready, as legal successors of K. James McCready." In addition, the parties are directed to meet, confer, and enter into a stipulation containing a briefing schedule for Defendants' proposed motion for summary judgment. Provided the briefing schedule is reasonable, the Court will so order the stipulation. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/2/2016. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 78 Motion to Set Aside; granting 81 Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement. For the foregoing reasons, the OAG's Objections are sustained and the Discovery Order is VACATED to the extent it compels the OAG to produce the Withheld Documents. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/22/11. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Compel to the extent indicated in the attached order. Ordered by Judge William D. Wall on 3/29/2011. (Disbrow, Sandra)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM & ORDER; denying 39 Motion to Strike; That for the reasons set forth herein, Defts' motion to strike (Docket Entry 39 ) is DENIED. ( Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 1/21/2011.) c/m c/ecf (Fagan, Linda)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying as moot 57 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' motio n for judgment on the pleadings, and DENIES as moot Defendants' appeal of Judge Wall's July 2010 Order. Plaintiff's claims based on conspiracy, supervisory liability under § 1983, false imprisonment, suppression of exculpatory evidence, failure to investigate, and intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress are DISMISSED. Plaintiff's remaining claims survive. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 12/21/2010. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
