Gray et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
| Auto Partners, LLC, William S. Gray and Sunrise Automotive, LLC |
| Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. |
| 2:2010cv03081 |
| July 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| E. Thomas Boyle |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Contract:Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re: 52 and 53 Motions for Leave to File are GRANTED. Defendant's Motion 46 for Attorney Fees is GRANTED IN PART. (See Order for details.) Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 7/16/2013. (Nohs, Bonnie)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 33 Motion for Attorney Fees - For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for attorneys' fees is GRANTED. Within thirty days, Defendant shall file its fee application on ECF as a "motion for attorneys' fees." Plaintiffs shall have thirty days from the date of Defendant's application to make objections. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/17/12. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may file an Amended Complaint, in accordance with the rulings in this Order, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 8/25/11. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
