Texas 1845, LLC v. Wu Air Corporation et al
Plaintiff: |
Texas 1845, LLC |
Defendant: |
Wu Air Corporation, Maine Aviation Aircraft Maintenance, LLC, Maine Aviation Aircraft Charter, LLC, Allyn Caruso and Wu Aviation Corporation |
Case Number: |
2:2011cv01825 |
Filed: |
April 13, 2011 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Office: |
Central Islip Office |
Presiding Judge: |
E. Thomas Boyle |
Presiding Judge: |
Joanna Seybert |
Nature of Suit: |
Contract: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
Jury Demanded By: |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
February 6, 2012 |
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 13 M otion to Strike; denying 25 Motion to Appoint Receiver. Based on the foregoing discussion, the Court orders the following: Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the Wu Defendants' counterclaims and strike certain affirmative defenses (Docket E ntry 12) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is denied as to the Wu Defendants' conversion counterclaim and their defamation counterclaim arising out of Plaintiff's allegedly false filing with the FAA. It is granted as to the tortiou s interference with contractual relations and fraud counterclaims and as to the remainder of the defamation counterclaims. The Wu Defendants may amend their counterclaims within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order. The Wu Defendants 9; personal jurisdiction and election of remedies affirmative defenses are struck, as is their jury demand. The Court does not strike the concurrent state court proceedings and payment affirmative defenses. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the Ma ine Defendants' counterclaims and strike an affirmative defense (Docket Entry 13) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Maine Defendants are directed to file their answer and opposition papers with the Court forthwith and not later than five (5) days from the date of this Order. Upon the Maine Defendants' compliance, Plaintiff may renew its motion with a one-page letter motion to the Court. No additional briefing from either side will be permitted. Plaintiff's motion for a receiver is DENIED at this time. Should Plaintiff move again for the appointment of a receiver, it shall provide the Court with the additional information described above and submit a proposed receivership order. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 2/3/12. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?