Orlando v. Nassau County D.A. Office
Plaintiff: Mark Orlando
Defendant: Nassau County D.A. Office
Case Number: 2:2011cv03992
Filed: August 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration. Consistent with the attached memorandum, petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion is denied. Ordered by Judge Edward R. Korman on 7/19/2020. (Roth, William)
March 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER appointing Jane Simkin Smith as petitioner's counsel. The Clerk is directed to close the case for administrative purposes until I receive a response from petitioner's counsel. I would expect such a response within sixty days from the date of this order. Ordered by Judge Edward R. Korman on 3/29/2017. (Kolodin, Zachary)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve, by electronic transmission, a copy of this Order, the underlying Petition, Petitioner's Affirmation, dated October 13, 2011, and the Exhibits annexed thereto, on the attorney for Res pondent. ORDERED that if the Petition is timely, Respondent shall prepare the state court record to be produced and filed upon the Court's request, and it is further ORDERED that no reply is required, however, should Petitioner want to reply, the reply shall be served on Respondent's counsel and filed with the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days of receipt of the answer. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/15/11. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court directs Petitioner to show cause by written affirmation, within thirty (30) days from entry of this Memorandum and Order, why the Petition should not be dismissed as time-barred by the AEDPA's one-year statute of limitations. If Petitioner fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, the instant Petition shall be dismissed as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/27/11. C/M (Valle, Christine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orlando v. Nassau County D.A. Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nassau County D.A. Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Orlando
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?