Arbor Realty Sr, Inc. v. Keener

Defendant: Mark S. Keener
Plaintiff: Arbor Realty Sr, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv04626
Filed: September 22, 2011
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Central Islip Office
Referring Judge: E. Thomas Boyle
Presiding Judge: Leonard D. Wexler
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2013 78 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED, that Arbor's 68 motion to dismiss Keener's counterclaims is granted and those counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 12/19/13. (Coleman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arbor Realty Sr, Inc. v. Keener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark S. Keener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arbor Realty Sr, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Baylis
Represented By: Johnathan M Burns
Represented By: Bonnie Hochman Rothell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.