Dasrath v. Stony Brook University Medical Center

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Dasrath v. Stony Brook University Medical Center

Dasrath v. Stony Brook University Medical Center

Plaintiff:	Anand Dasrath
Defendant:	Stony Brook University Medical Center
Case Number:	2:2012cv01484
Filed:	March 27, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	E. Thomas Boyle
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 17, 2015	Filing 60 ORDER granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. SO ORDERED that defts motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/17/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
April 29, 2014	Filing 44 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: SO ORDERED that the Court is satisfied that this recommendation is not facially erroneous, and it is adopted by the Court. Upon de novo review of the remaining recommendations of the Report, the Court hereby denies plaintiff leave to amend to assert retaliation claims pursuant to Section 1981 and NYSHRL against Strianse and Giacopelli. The only claims that remain pending in this action are: (i) discrimination in violation of Title VII against the Medical Center, on grounds other than hostile work environment; and (ii) discrimination in violation of NYSHRL § 296(1) against Strianse. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 4/29/2014. (Florio, Lisa)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 17, 2015

Filing 60 ORDER granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. SO ORDERED that defts motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/17/2015. (Florio, Lisa)

April 29, 2014

Filing 44 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: SO ORDERED that the Court is satisfied that this recommendation is not facially erroneous, and it is adopted by the Court. Upon de novo review of the remaining recommendations of the Report, the Court hereby denies plaintiff leave to amend to assert retaliation claims pursuant to Section 1981 and NYSHRL against Strianse and Giacopelli. The only claims that remain pending in this action are: (i) discrimination in violation of Title VII against the Medical Center, on grounds other than hostile work environment; and (ii) discrimination in violation of NYSHRL § 296(1) against Strianse. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 4/29/2014. (Florio, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dasrath v. Stony Brook University Medical Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anand Dasrath
Represented By:	Steven Thomas Sledzik
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Stony Brook University Medical Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?