Duckhorn Wine Company v. Duck Walk Vineyards Inc.

Defendant: Duck Walk Vineyards Inc.
Plaintiff: Duckhorn Wine Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv01642
Filed: March 27, 2013
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Central Islip Office
Referring Judge: Gary R. Brown
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 9, 2014 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 7 Motion to Dismiss; For the foregoing reasons, Duck Walk's motion to dismiss the Complaint is DENIED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/9/2014. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duckhorn Wine Company v. Duck Walk Vineyards Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duck Walk Vineyards Inc.
Represented By: Steven R. Schlesinger
Represented By: Linda S. Agnew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duckhorn Wine Company
Represented By: John C. Briody
Represented By: Henry C. Bunsow
Represented By: Gayle Rosenstein Klein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.