Raymond A. Semente D.C., P.C. v. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. et al
| Raymond A. Semente D.C., P.C. |
| County of Suffolk, Empire City Subway Company (Limited), Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc., Suffolk County Labor/Management Committee, The Employee Medical Health Plan of Suffolk County, Verizon Advanced Data Inc., Verizon Avenue Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., Verizon Corporate Services Corp., Verizon New England Inc., Verizon New York Inc. and Verizon Services Corp. |
| 2:2014cv05823 |
| October 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Steven I. Locke |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
ORDER granting 122 Motion for Reconsideration: For the reasons discussed in the attached, The Court GRANTS reconsideration of its Order dismissing the case for lack of standing. The Court nevertheless adheres to its Order, as Plaintiff was assigne d benefits in violation of the health plans' enforceable anti-assignment provisions, and, even if Plaintiff was assigned solely causes of action, Plaintiff would still lack standing under New York law. Accordingly, the case remains DISMISSED. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 3/2/2021. (Ready, John)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER denying 115 Motion for Summary Judgment: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and the case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case. See attached Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 3/16/2020. (Hoon, Megha)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER re 106 : To the extent the County or some other party may be requesting a declaratory judgment to take effect depending upon whether plaintiff and Mr. Scher's defendants actually settle their dispute, the application is denied on the information provided. See attached Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 5/31/2019. (Bochner, Francesca)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, this Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. Accordin gly, the Court adopts the October 12, 2018 Report and Recommendation of Judge Locke as if set forth herein, and Defendant Suffolk County's motion to dismiss is denied. See attached Order. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 12/11/2018. (Bochner, Francesca)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: DE 82 Motion to Sever and Dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order and Report and Recommendation, Defendants' motion to sever is denied. Further, the Court respectfully recommends that Suffolk County's motion to dismiss be denied. Entered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 10/12/2018. (Kantor, Jesse)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting 49 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is granted. Plaintiff's claims against Suffolk based on the Regulation are reinstated. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 9/6/2016. (Kaley, Regina)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The parties are to submit further briefing in accordance with the schedule set forth in the attached. Ordered by Judge Denis R. Hurley on 12/4/2015. (Kaley, Regina)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
