Brown Media Corporation, et al v. K&L Gates LLP, et al.

Plaintiff: Roy E. Brown and Brown Media Corporation
Defendant: Edward M. Fox, K&L Gates, LLP and Eric T. Moser
Case Number: 2:2015cv00676
Filed: January 28, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Referring Judge: Arlene R. Lindsay
Presiding Judge: Arthur D. Spatt
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawl
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER - For the reasons set forth above, the Defendants' 14 motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), to dismiss the Plaintiffs' complaint is granted in part and denied in part. The Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted without prejudice (1) with respect to all claims asserted by Roy and (2) with respect to Brown Media's tortious interference with prospective economic relations and fraud claims. The Defendants motion to dismiss is denied with respect to Brown Medias breach of fiduciary duty claim. The Court denies without prejudice the Plaintiffs' request for leave to amend as procedurally improper, and grants the Plaintiffs leave to renew their request to file an amended complaint in a manner consistent with FED. R. CIV. P. 15 within sixty days of the date of this decision. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. It is SO ORDERED by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/28/2018. (Coleman, Laurie)
November 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting 14 motion to dismiss; For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the Court grants the Plaintiffs motion to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 11/21/2015. (Coleman, Laurie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown Media Corporation, et al v. K&L Gates LLP, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy E. Brown
Represented By: Daniel L. Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brown Media Corporation
Represented By: Daniel L. Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward M. Fox
Represented By: Anthony C. Acampora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K&L Gates, LLP
Represented By: Anthony C. Acampora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric T. Moser
Represented By: Anthony C. Acampora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?