Luca v. Giaccone et al
James R. Luca |
Carlo Dellapina, Fairfield Financial Mortgage Group, Inc., Candice Giaccone, Michael A. Haskel, Esq. and Scott A. Steinberg, Esq. |
2:2016cv04975 |
September 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Pamela K. Chen |
Arlene R. Lindsay |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
Motion for Return of Property |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court declares that Fairfields Attorneys have a charging lien over the funds deposited in the Escrow Settlement Fund and that Fairfields Attorneys charging lien ha s priority over any charging or judgment lien possessed by Luca or LL&A. Further, the Court finds that LL&A does not possess a retaining lien over the funds deposited in the Escrow Settlement Fund, and, even if LL&A did possess a retaining lien, it would be subordinate to Fairfields Attorneys charging lien. Accordingly, Lucas motion 10 is denied and Fairfields motion 12 is granted.The parties shall submit a status report by August 31, 2017, confirming that the Escrow Settlement Fund was turned over to Fairfield's Attorneys in accordance with the parties' Stipulations 9 and 14 and this Order. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/24/2017. (Fletcher, Camille) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.