Shepard v. Kirkpatrick

Shepard v. Kirkpatrick

Petitioner:	Emania Shepard
Respondent:	Michael Kirkpatrick
Case Number:	2:2017cv01235
Filed:	March 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Joan M. Azrack
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 22, 2021	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER that the petition is denied and the case is dismissed. Because petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, no certificate of appealability shall issue. See 28:2253(c)(2) . The Court certifies pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/21/2021 ) copy will be mailed w/judgment to petitioner. *Forwarded for jgm. (Guzzi, Roseann)
April 4, 2019	Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the appointment of counsel: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Shepard's requests for appointment of counsel are denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully ordered to mail a copy of this Order, as well as the entire docket sheet for this case, to Shepard and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 4/4/2019. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 22, 2021

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER that the petition is denied and the case is dismissed. Because petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, no certificate of appealability shall issue. See 28:2253(c)(2) . The Court certifies pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/21/2021 ) copy will be mailed w/judgment to petitioner. *Forwarded for jgm. (Guzzi, Roseann)

April 4, 2019

Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the appointment of counsel: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Shepard's requests for appointment of counsel are denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully ordered to mail a copy of this Order, as well as the entire docket sheet for this case, to Shepard and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 4/4/2019. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shepard v. Kirkpatrick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Kirkpatrick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Emania Shepard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?