CIT Bank, N.A. v. Coombes et al
| CIT Bank, N.A. |
| Diane A. Coombes, Jeffrey Coombes and Velocity Investments, LLC |
| 2:2017cv05871 |
| October 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Steven I. Locke |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER: It has been more than fourteen days since the service of the R&R, and the parties have not filed objections. As such, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, this Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006 (ADS) (SIL), 2015 WL 520346, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2015) (reviewing Report and Recommendation without objections fo r clear error). Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. The Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is granted in part and denied in part as recommended by the R&R. The Court selects Elizabeth Gill, Esq., as the referee. The Plaintiff is directed to submit a proposed judgment consistent with the R&R no later than fourteen days from the issuance of this order. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 6/18/2019. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
