GB et al v. Town of Hempstead et al
| GB, HK, JF, MA, MV, NP and PM |
| Nasrin G. Ahmad, Diana Bianculli-Muller, Citizens for Santino, John/Jane Doe Other Entities, John/Jane Doe Republican Organizations, William Muller III, Anthony Santino, Town of Hempstead and Michael Zappolo |
| 2:2017cv06625 |
| November 13, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
258
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to amend their complaint. (ECF No. 216 .) The Court presumes familiarity with the background of this case, which is set forth in Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay's February 10, 2025, Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on the instant motion. (See ECF No. 249 .) In the R&R, Judge Lindsay recommended that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs' motion. (See ECF No. 249 at 18.) Plaintiffs and the Town Defendants filed timely objections to the R&R. (ECF No. 252 ; ECF No. 253 .) The Court agrees with and adopts Judge Lindsay's analysis and recommendations set forth in the R&R. The parties' objections to the R&R are OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS the R&R. SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM & ORDER for details. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 3/6/2025. (LC)
|
|
Filing
233
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: On April 22, 2024, Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay issued an Order (the "Discovery Order") that, among other things, denied Plaintiffs' motion to compel Defendants William Muller, III ("Muller") and To wn of Hempstead (the "Town") to submit to forensic examinations of the formers personal email account and the latters computer systems. (ECF No. 201 .) Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs objections to the Discovery Order. (ECF No. 224 .) For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs' objections are OVERRULED. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 8/5/2024. (LC) (Main Document 233 replaced on 8/5/2024) (LC).
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court overrules the Plaintiffs' objections and adopts the R&R in its entirety. Therefore, the Court denies the motion to disqualify. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 6/21/2019. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
