Reyes et al v. Nabis Delicatessen, Inc. et al
| Rene Malloquin, Alvaro Sesam Iboy, Augusto Sesam Iboy and Nelson Soto Reyes |
| Nabis Delicatessen, Inc., Hurmut Hotaki, Hurmat Hotaki and Nabis Delicatessen, Inc. doing business as Burnside Deli |
| 2:2018cv01211 |
| February 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Rene Malloquin (Forman, Arthur) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Alvaro Sesam Iboy (Forman, Arthur) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Augusto Sesam Iboy (Forman, Arthur) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to become party in a collective action. by Nelson Soto Reyes (Forman, Arthur) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10226711 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Nelson Soto Reyes, Rene Malloquin, Alvaro Sesam Iboy, Augusto Sesam Iboy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Nabis Delicatessen, Inc., #2 Proposed Summons Hurmut Hotaki, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Forman, Arthur) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
