Solomon v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
| David Solomon |
| Jane Doe, Amazon.com, Inc., Jay Warren and Whole Foods Market, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv05528 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven I Locke |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Amazon.com, Inc., Jay Warren, Whole Foods Market, Inc.. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. by David Solomon (Pattis, Norman) |
| Proposed summons is rejected; The #7 proposed summons for Defendant Jane Doe can not be issued; an address must be provided; the Clerk's Office cannot issue the summons. Counsel is advised to submit completed proposed summonses in PDF fillable format using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Proposed summonses are rejected; the section that reads "The answer or motion must be served on plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are:" has not be completed; the Clerk's Office cannot issue the summonses. Counsel is advised to submit completed proposed summonses in PDF fillable format using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Williams, Erica) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/15/2018: #1 Additional Corrections) (Rodin, Deanna). |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet.. by David Solomon (Pattis, Norman) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by David Solomon (Pattis, Norman) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by David Solomon (Pattis, Norman) |
| NOTICE - the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to forward a completed Civil Cover Sheet, answering all questions, including the **NY-E DIVISION OF BUSINESS RULE 50.1(d)(2)*** and the ***CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** sections on the second page. Also include any Proposed Summons. These documents can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Williams, Erica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10772243 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by David Solomon. (Pattis, Norman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
