Osman v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Christopher Osman
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2019cv02210
Filed: April 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary M. Dickman on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (aty to be noticed) (Dickman, Mary)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff filed the complaint on 4/15/2019. The parties are directed to adhere to the following policies, based on E.D.N.Y. Administrative Order 2015-5 (Amon, Chief Judge), for expediting the disposition of Social Security cases. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 4/17/2019. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Related Case indicated on the civil cover sheet in case number 19cv2210. (Rodin, Deanna)
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Rodin, Deanna)
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
April 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11387878 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Christopher Osman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowes, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osman v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Osman
Represented By: Christopher James Bowes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Mary M. Dickman
Represented By: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?