Dale Progress, Ltd. v. Fued

Plaintiff: Dale Progress, Ltd.
Defendant: Charles Fued
Case Number: 2:2019cv03050
Filed: May 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Steven M Gold
Referring Judge: LaShann DeArcy Hall
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2019 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Charles Fued. (Rodin, Deanna)
May 23, 2019 Filing 7 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Rodin, Deanna)
May 23, 2019 This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Rodin, Deanna)
May 23, 2019 Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
May 23, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
May 23, 2019 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
May 23, 2019 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Dale Progress, Ltd. (Gioconda, Joseph)
May 23, 2019 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information. by Dale Progress, Ltd. (Gioconda, Joseph)
May 23, 2019 A Civil Cover Sheet was not filed - The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to submit the Civil Cover Sheet using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Flanagan, Doreen)
May 22, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dale Progress, Ltd. (Gioconda, Joseph)
May 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Fued d/b/a Rockville Audio filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11504132 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Dale Progress, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Gioconda, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dale Progress, Ltd. v. Fued
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dale Progress, Ltd.
Represented By: Joseph Christopher Gioconda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Fued
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?