United States of America v. Marmol
| United States of America |
| Andrea Marmol |
| 2:2019cv03510 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Contract: Recovery Student Loan |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 Default of Promissory Note |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT It appearing from the docket maintained in this action that defendant Andrea Marmol has failed to appear or otherwise defend this action, the default of defendant Andrea Marmol is hereby noted pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Poveda, J.) |
| Filing 6 Request for Certificate of Default by United States of America (Manfredi, John) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Andrea Marmol served on 6/25/2019, answer due 7/16/2019. (Manfredi, John) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrea Marmol. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrea Marmol, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Manfredi, John) Modified on 6/14/2019 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Marmol | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrea Marmol | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | John Manfredi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
